Terrorist Attack or Self Sabotage
Conservative Hippie Podcast
Conservative Hippie Podcast
Terrorist Attack or Self Sabotage
Loading
/

EP-071 Terrorist Attack or Self Sabotage

Two important links. 20 years after the terrorist strike on 9/11. We, the American public, can no longer look away. Please take the time to watch this video and visit the evidence at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

70% of the public at the end of 2003 believed Saddam Hussein was linked to 911 attack.

US Air Defense failed in 1.5 hours to act on the morning of 9/11. NORAD was running simulations. These simulation caused complications with communications and left air force resources spent. Even after two towers were struck by hijacked airplanes the simulation was not canceled. Two jets were airborne in time to prevent the Pentagon strike, but they were sent out over the ocean.

Amazing timing for a war games simulation.  Similar to the Event 201 pandemic simulation that occurred at the same time as Covid was released.  Accidentally or intentionally?

Did you know in July of 2001.  The attorney general of the United States John Ashcroft, who always flew commercial airlines as his method of travel, switched to chartered government planes?  He did so because of a FBI threat assessment that warned Ashcroft to stay off commercial airliners.

Have you heard of US Air Force General Ralph Eberhart?  He was Commander in Chief of the U.S. Space Command and Commander in Chief of NORAD on 9/11/2001.  On the tenth of September, just 12 hours before the attack, General Eberhart lowered the Infocon alert system to its lowest threat level.  Infocon is an alert system that defends against attacks on communications networks within the Department of Defense.

On 9/11, after Eberhart knew the country was under attack, he drove from Peterson Air Force base to Cheyenne Mountain NORAD facility.  He was absent and unavailable to lead for 45 minutes to an hour.  The drive usually takes 30 minutes.  The General could have ended the war games simulation, and he could have scrambled the remaining jets to defend against the remaining hijacked planes.

Yet despite bizarre incompetence, at best, and failure to lead in crucial moments while the country was under attack, General Eberhart was promoted to lead the newly created US Northern Command, the nations premiere military homeland defense organization.

Did you know the planes that hit the Pentagon and the Twin Towers performed maneuvers that were at the limits of the plane’s capabilities? Did you know the hijackers were described as “piss-poor” pilots by their trainers?

One hijacker actually trained on a Boeing 737 in a simulator, but supposedly flew a 757 on 9/11 performing expert maneuvers at the peak of the commercial airplane’s capabilities.  The cockpit of the simulator model trained on and the actual model flown are drastically different. One of the hijackers, Marwan Al-Sheikki had never flown a jet before in his life, and yet was able to perform expert maneuvers at the limits of the plane’s capabilities.

But the feat of the day was by the hijacker of Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon.  Pilots with both fighter jet and commercial airliner experience have stated they would have a hard time performing the maneuvers made that day by Flight 77.

Air traffic controllers actually thought the plane was a military aircraft when they saw the sharp precise high speed movements by Flight 77.  The pilot was able to fly past the Pentagon, perform a 180 degree turn while descending at a high rate of speed, and then keep control as they skimmed the ground striking the side of the building.

It was the flight path analysis that I saw many years ago that made me question the official narrative of the 9/11 hijackings.  Too me, it is one of the largest pieces of evidence that there is a broad cover-up of the actual events that occurred that day.  Just by using common sense, the flight path of Flight 77 makes no sense.  A drastically inexperienced pilot made expert maneuvers to the side of the Pentagon, when striking the top would have been much easier and caused much more damage.

An instructor from one of the hijackers flight schools said this about the Flight 77 hijacker,

“Hani Hanjour was not someone cut out to be a pilot.  He had poor motivation, a poor understanding of the basic principles of aviation and poor judgement, combined with poor technical skills.”

Flight school instructors who trained the Flight 77 hijacker said that he could not even fly a single engine Cessna by himself.  Yet, this guy made expert maneuvers at the limits of capability in a large commercial airliner.

Did you know Department of Defense top level official’s offices were on the opposite side of the Pentagon from the strike?  The hijacked plane actually hit a section of the outer ring of the Pentagon that had recently been fortified through a renovation program?

Can I interject from the narrative stream at this point?  Perhaps you are logically thinking a few layers deeper than I’m presenting.  Perhaps you have thought there is no way our military or intelligence agencies would participate in any way with an attack on US citizens and targets.

I agree.  It seems outlandish and frankly impossible. But I do have evidence that the United States has contemplated this exact situation in the past.  Have you heard of Operation Northwoods? Operation Northwoods was a plan being drawn up by the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962 to assist them in conquering Cuba to thwart Russian incursion so close to home.

What does this have to do with 9/11?  Hang with me.  Let’s look at what they were contemplating to win public support for action against Cuba.  This was taken from declassified documents.

These are quotes taken from the planning document regarding the methods they could use to create public outrage and support for military action:

“It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en-route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama, or Venezuela.  The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.

A.  An aircraft at Eglin Air Force Base would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area.  At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases.  The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.

B.  Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida.  From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin Air Force Base where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status.  The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight path.  When over Cuba the drone will be transmitting on the international distress frequency a “may day” message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft.  The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal.  This will allow ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to “sell” the incident.”

Operation Northwoods

So they had ideas of drone airplanes for false flag events all the way back in the 60’s.  Imagine what plans they could come up with over the next 40 years.  Check out the document for yourself.  This is just one proposed plan.  In other proposed plans they actually lay out complicated terrorist events with little regard for innocent human life.

Ok, back to the worst collective day of most of our American lives.  We have a lot to cover.

Did you know in 2001, a cell phone call from 35,000 feet is impossible to connect?  Well, maybe in an extreme fluke a call could connect, but it would be dropped nearly immediately.  Experiments were performed that showed calls were nearly impossible to make from even 8,000 feet.  But on 9/11 several calls miraculously went through when hijacked planes were supposedly cruising tens of thousands of feet in the air. This scientific anomaly is just one of many strange circumstances surrounding the phone calls made from hijacked airplanes that day, including flight attendant CeeCee Lyles voicemail to her husband that ends with, “It’s a frame.”

Did you know the engines used by the 757 that plowed into the Pentagon disappeared?  It’s true.  Each engine is 7,000 pounds.  Made to withstand enormous amounts of heat and pressure.  The engine cores are considered practically indestructible.

The engines are the most sturdy part of any plane.  Much more resilient and impact-full than the plane fuselage.  Yet, at the Pentagon a round hole was created on an inner wall attributed to the fuselage.

The plane could not have maintained its shape travelling through 300 feet of multiple columns of reinforced concrete.  If anything could have, it would have been the engines.  The damage to the Pentagon, and the evidence recovered doesn’t match a Boeing 757.

The only video from the Pentagon released to the public was from a parking gate booth.  It’s low quality.  Are we to believe there were no cameras operating within and around one of the most secure facilities in the world?

Did you know the twin towers had an asbestos problem?  From 1986 to 1999 $58.2 million was spent on asbestos abatement projects.  And this was just for select projects on a small percentage of floors.  As of the year 2000 the estimated bill for asbestos abatement for the twin towers was up to 1 billion dollars.

The Port Authority, owners of the World Trade Center towers, sued insurance companies to pay for the asbestos abatement.  In May of 2001, four months before September 11th, the Port Authority lost this ten year old court battle.

This is where Larry Silverstein comes to the Port Authority’s rescue.  He was the owner of Building 7 at the World Trade Center complex.  In July 2001 Silverstein purchased the Twin Towers from the Port Authority.  He had to protect his investment so he purchased an insurance policy worth 3.2 billion dollars in case of total destruction.

Amazing timing isn’t it!  But the timing doesn’t end there.  Silverstein enjoyed spending every morning in his office within the twin towers.  Every morning, except the morning of September 11th.  Even though he had a meeting scheduled that day in the north tower, Silverstein discovered he had a conflicting doctor’s appointment scheduled by his wife.  Wow, amazing timing.

Did you know there were multiple explosions reported in the sub-level of building one before the hijacked flight impacted the building?  Not only is there eye witness testimony of the large explosions in the sub-level of the building, but there is audio evidence corroborating the eye witness testimony.  Before the plane struck.

A large explosion also occurred in building seven before the twin towers collapsed.

World Trade Center building 7 collapsed many hours after the twin towers fell.  Official reports claim office fire collapsed the building.  Amazing that the first collapse of a high rise building due to fire in the history of the world, looked exactly like a controlled demolition.

Even though a building had never collapsed due to office fires, rumors circulated at ground zero that the building was going to come down.  The BBC even reported that the building had collapsed before it actually did.

These are just a few pieces of evidence and questions that have been suppressed and gone unanswered for 20 years. This attack was used as justification for war on two fronts: Iraq and Afghanistan. But a third front was also opened up as a result of the attacks on 9/11: A war on the privacy and rights of the American people.

Now 20 years later, a new attack on American rights is being waged with a new invisible enemy and catalyst. I believe we can never adequately defend ourselves until an adequate investigation is performed on the attacks of 9/11.

But 20 years later, is it too late for that? Is it too late for us? Is this the final culmination of the destruction of the United States, and the birth of the New World Order? If it is, we have no one to blame but ourselves. Distracted by economy, and herded by fear, we failed to hold our leaders accountable.

Email Feedback to [email protected]

Support this Podcast!

  • Send Bitcoin – 1LPbdgpzutSg8Sx5wS5wJjxxTB7BPFUwr8
  • Send Decred – DseKW8p4JBWKx9X5GwwzVSxnLMMRWvRH3za
  • Send Polkadot – 15mNm1Xmj7vdsNNY1RR3TVYUqdHSVqPv4ySYqzZ31S88XomZ
  • Send Waves – 3P6Yi3nhCZGEKvDPd5CyFAvs7sa4F4LtjNM
  • Send Solana – 3gxZPbNNEF78mqLYYTAzKPtuGNdgpE6muhfaqvrwykus

Sponsors:
The Perfect Vaporizer!
SmokinJs.com … Use Code HIPPIE for 15% off Your Order
ME!
StonerHoroscope.com

The post Terrorist Attack or Self Sabotage appeared first on Conservative Hippie Podcast.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *